Established a clear legal classification framework for cryptocurrencies.
Divided regulatory oversight between the CFTC (commodities) and the SEC (securities).
Recommended banks be enabled to custody and offer digital asset services.
Enacted the GENIUS Act to solidify stablecoin regulation and preserve U.S. dollar hegemony.
Proposed prohibition of a retail CBDC and bolstered stablecoin enforcement under the GENIUS Act.
Called for a tailored tax regime addressing staking, mining, and crypto-specific activities.
Industry reactions: positive on clarity but tensions emerging over omitted Bitcoin reserve details.
1. Background and Context
On July 30, 2025, the White House’s Digital Asset Working Group, established by Executive Order 14178, released a 160-page report titled Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology. The report synthesizes policy recommendations designed to transition the United States into the global leader of the blockchain economy, balancing innovation, investor protection, and financial stability. It builds on three landmark laws passed earlier in July—the GENIUS Act (stablecoin framework), the CLARITY Act (token classification), and another bill accelerating DeFi oversight.
2. Legal Classification Framework
A cornerstone of the recommendations is a unified classification framework that definitively distinguishes between “commodity tokens” (e.g., Bitcoin, certain algorithmic tokens) and “security tokens” (e.g., ICO-issued tokens deemed investment contracts). By codifying a taxonomy, market participants can avoid costly legal disputes and ensure consistent application of trading, custody, and reporting rules. This clarity also primes the industry for broader institutional adoption.
3. Split of Regulatory Oversight
To avoid duplication and regulatory arbitrage, the report proposes dividing authority between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC):
CFTC: Oversight of spot and derivative markets for commodity tokens.
SEC: Regulation of any token that meets the Howey Test for securities.
This 60/40 oversight split (commodities vs. securities) aims to streamline enforcement and foster specialization among agencies.
Figure 2: Proposed SEC vs CFTC Oversight Split (Insert after this paragraph)
4. Empowering Banks to Custody and Service Digital Assets
The report advocates enabling federally chartered banks and credit unions to offer custody, settlement, and related digital asset services. It recommends:
Simplifying charter applications for crypto custody.
Clarifying capital and liquidity requirements for crypto exposures.
Permitting blockchain integration to modernize payments. These steps, the report argues, will lower counterparty risk and attract institutional liquidity to U.S.-regulated venues.
5. Leveraging Stablecoins for U.S. Dollar Hegemony
Under the newly enacted GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act), stablecoins must be backed one-to-one by U.S. dollars or equivalent low-risk assets, with stringent audit and reserve requirements. The report highlights stablecoins as a crucial tool to modernize payment rails and maintain the dollar’s global dominance.
Figure 1: Stablecoin Market Capitalization Trend (2023–2025) (Insert after this paragraph)
6. Prohibition of a Retail CBDC
Contrary to some peer economies exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), the report recommends the CBDC Anti-Surveillance Act, which would ban any domestic retail CBDC to safeguard privacy and limit government overreach. Instead, it urges maximizing stablecoin adoption under federal and state dual supervision.
7. Tax Regime Tailored to Crypto
Recognizing the unique economic mechanisms of staking, mining, and micro-transactions, the report calls for a dedicated tax code under Title 26 to treat crypto as its own asset class—incorporating clear wash-sale rules for digital assets and deferring taxation on long-term staking rewards until realized. These measures aim to reduce administrative burdens and align tax liabilities with actual economic events.
8. Industry Reactions and Emerging Tensions
Initial responses from exchanges, custodians, and investment firms have been broadly positive, applauding the regulatory certainty. However, tensions surfaced when the report omitted details of the previously announced Strategic Bitcoin Reserve—expected to deploy up to 200,000 BTC in U.S. holdings. While many stakeholders emphasized the forward-looking legislative wins, some decried the lack of timeline or operational guidance on the reserve.
Conclusion
The Trump administration’s Digital Asset Working Group report charted a comprehensive roadmap for U.S. crypto policy—linking classification, oversight, institutional banking, stablecoin supremacy, CBDC prohibition, and bespoke taxation into a unified framework. By legislating clarity through the GENIUS and CLARITY Acts and urging agile action across the SEC, CFTC, Treasury, and IRS, the report seeks to catalyze a “Golden Age of Crypto” for America. As critical details—like the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve—remain in flux, continued industry-government dialogue will determine the pace and inclusivity of crypto’s institutional adoption.
About Us and Media
Blockchain and cryptocurrency media covering and exposing the practical application development on the blockchain industry and undiscovered coins.
Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.