
Main Points :
- SEC Chairman Paul Atkins unveils a comprehensive regulatory agenda—“Project Crypto”—to clarify rules on issuance, custody, and trading of digital assets.
- The Spring 2025 rulemaking agenda proposes exemptions, safe harbors, and tailored custody/trading frameworks.
- Emphasis on bringing crypto businesses and innovation back to the U.S., enabling “super-apps” and on-chain integration with capital markets.
- Classification shift: “most crypto assets are not securities” unless packaged as investment contracts.
- Collaboration with Presidential Working Group (PWG) recommendations, rulemaking via interpretive/exemptive authority, and public comment solicitation.
- Potential risks and criticisms: concerns over investor protection, dismantling Consolidated Audit Trail, and prioritizing Wall Street over Main Street.
- Broader context: alignment with Trump administration’s pro-crypto stance, legislative efforts (Genius Act, CLARITY Act), and U.S. aiming for crypto leadership.
Introduction
In an industry long plagued by regulatory ambiguity, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Chairman Paul Atkins has embarked on an assertive new direction. Dubbed “Project Crypto,” the initiative signals a major shift from enforcement-driven oversight to rule-based clarity—just in time for crypto entrepreneurs, investors, and institutions seeking the next revenue stream and practical uses of blockchain technology.
I. Project Crypto: Clarity, Innovation, and Competition
Atkins presented his vision at the America First Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., unveiling Project Crypto as a Commission-wide initiative aimed at modernizing securities regulation to accommodate blockchain-based systems and decentralized finance (DeFi).
- The SEC staff has been directed to craft clear and simple rules of the road governing crypto asset distributions, custody, and trading, thereby providing much-needed legal certainty to issuers and intermediaries.
- Notably, Atkins stressed that most crypto assets are not securities, a marked departure from prior broad interpretations, and asserted that being deemed a security should not stigmatize the asset but instead offer a flexible design framework.
II. Spring 2025 Rulemaking Agenda: Tailored Frameworks
In its Spring 2025 regulatory agenda, the SEC laid out several proposals targeting the digital asset space:
- Provisions for the offer and sale of digital assets, potentially including exemptions and safe harbors to accommodate industry practices.
- Revisions addressing custody rules, especially for advisory clients and funds holding crypto assets.
- Evaluations of how crypto assets can be traded on national securities exchanges and alternative trading systems (ATSs).
- Reductions in compliance burdens, streamlined disclosure requirements, and proposals to modernize outdated capital formation pathways.
- Invitation for public comment on revisiting the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) in light of recent court decisions and cost concerns.
III. Reshoring Cryptocurrency Innovation
Aligned with recommendations by the President’s Working Group on Digital Assets (PWG), Project Crypto aims to bring crypto businesses and innovation back to the U.S. by offering regulatory certainty and discouraging offshore structuring.
The initiative also encourages the emergence of multifunctional platforms (“super-apps”) that offer integrated services like trading, staking, and lending under a unified regulatory license.
By enabling tokenization of traditional securities and integrating on-chain systems with mainstream capital markets, the project signals a radical shift toward on-chain financial markets.
IV. Rulemaking Tools, Collaboration, and Public Engagement
Rather than relying on enforcement-first tactics, Atkins emphasized a policy-driven, rulemaking approach—using interpretive and exemptive authorities and inviting public input.
The SEC’s Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, will play a central role in implementing these proposals in coordination with PWG guidance.
V. Criticisms and Concerns
Not everyone is convinced. Critics argue that this agenda puts Wall Street and crypto industry interests ahead of retail investor protection. For instance, Better Markets warns that increased exposure to speculative private markets and reduction of audit mechanisms (like CAT) could harm Main Street investors.
Market observers also point to systemic risk concerns, drawing parallels to pre-2008 deregulation, and raising flags about stablecoin volatility and unchecked tokenized securities.
VI. Broader Policy and Legislative Context
This regulatory shift aligns closely with the Trump administration’s pro-crypto posture—dropping enforcement actions against major exchanges (e.g., Coinbase, Binance, Kraken), emphasizing deregulation, and positioning the U.S. as a crypto leader.
Legislative developments such as the CLARITY Act (defining digital assets and regulatory authority) and the GENIUS Act (addressing stablecoin regulation) are advancing, and the SEC is coordinating its rulemaking to complement these efforts.
VII. Implications for Practitioners, Innovators, and Investors
For those seeking new revenue streams or practical blockchain solutions, the SEC’s clarity-driven agenda offers a promising regulatory environment.
- Issuers and developers may navigate with greater certainty, especially for ICOs, airdrops, and token rewards.
- Custodians and exchanges gain options for self-custody and integration with registrants under modernized frameworks
- Investors and institutions may benefit from enhanced liquidity, transparency, and access via tokenized securities and integrated services.
A schematic diagram illustrating the SEC’s new crypto regulatory landscape:

Conclusion
The SEC’s Project Crypto and Spring 2025 rulemaking agenda mark a transformative moment for U.S. digital asset regulation. By choosing rule-based clarity over enforcement-driven uncertainty, and by embracing on-chain innovation and reshoring, the U.S. may well reclaim leadership in the global crypto economy. For those exploring new crypto opportunities—from revenue models to blockchain integration—this presents both opportunity and responsibility: innovators must align with emerging frameworks while ensuring investor protection and market integrity remain paramount.