“Why Bitcoin Didn’t Care: Powell’s QT Exit Signal and Persistent Bearish Sentiment in Crypto Markets”

Table of Contents

Main Points :

  • Fed Chair Powell suggested the Federal Reserve may soon end quantitative tightening (QT), signaling a potential liquidity shift.
  • Despite that, Bitcoin has shown little price reaction and remains under pressure.
  • The BTC options market continues to favor put premiums over calls, reflecting ongoing bearish sentiment.
  • The derivatives market, especially options, has grown large enough to influence spot BTC dynamics.
  • Macro and geopolitical risks, weak institutional conviction, and deleveraging events have overshadowed monetary policy clues.
  • For prospective crypto investors and practitioners, the current environment suggests caution, hedging, and opportunity zones rather than blind momentum chasing.

Introduction

In mid-October 2025, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell dropped a hint that the central bank may soon conclude its long-running balance sheet reduction program—i.e. quantitative tightening (QT). This pivot, had it come under different circumstances, might have ignited a rally in risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. Yet Bitcoin (BTC) barely budged. Despite the signal of potential policy easing, the market remains weighed down by lingering bearish sentiment, derivative market structure, macro uncertainty, and recent deleveraging shocks.

For a readership seeking the next crypto opportunity or practical insight into blockchain-based strategies, this disconnect between macro signals and crypto reaction offers several lessons. Below is a fuller narrative of what happened, why Bitcoin didn’t “cheer,” and what to watch next.

The Fed Hints at a QT Stop

Powell’s Subtle Shift

At the National Association for Business Economics conference in Philadelphia, Powell remarked that the Fed’s “long-stated plan is to stop balance sheet runoff when reserves are somewhat above the level we judge consistent with ample reserve conditions.” He cautioned that “in the coming months” that point may be reached, and that the Fed is watching a broad set of indicators to inform the decision. (Source: Reuters)

Historically, the Fed has run QT to drain excess liquidity created during major stimulus epochs. Since it began in 2022, the Fed’s balance sheet has shrunk from around $9 trillion to about $6.6 trillion. The Fed’s strategy now appears to be avoiding a contraction that drives reserves below “ample” levels, which might destabilize short-term funding markets.

Some crypto commentators have interpreted Powell’s balance-sheet comments as a tacit signal that the Fed is preparing for the end of QT—or perhaps a gradual shift toward a more liquidity-neutral regime. Kevin (of Kev Capital TA) for instance asserted that Powell “telegraphed” the wind-down and predicted a forthcoming crypto bull run tied to altcoin outperformance.

But It’s Not That Simple

However, the cessation of QT is not identical to the resumption of quantitative easing (QE). Even with QT halted, the Fed does not necessarily commit to aggressive asset purchases or monetary easing. The QT pace itself has already slowed considerably: since mid-2024, the Fed has limited monthly Treasury redemptions to $5 billion and capped MBS (mortgage bonds) runoff at $35 billion. Thus, halting QT may be more of a fine-tuning than a dramatic policy reversal. Some observers—like the anonymous “Markets and Mayhem” on X—note that ending a minimal QT is hardly a surprise and may not create a strong bullish catalyst.

Bitcoin’s Tepid Reaction

Flat Price Action in the Face of Big Signals

In contrast to traditional asset classes, Bitcoin reacted almost indifferently to Powell’s remarks. At the time of the initial article, BTC was trading near $113,000, essentially flat over the preceding 24 hours. Despite macro intrigue, the crypto market had little conviction to run.

Furthermore, in the BTC options space (e.g. Deribit), put (sell) options continued commanding higher premiums than calls (buy), signaling a leaning toward downside hedging rather than optimistic bets. This pattern even held for options maturing as late as March 2026.

Some analysts interpret this as a cautionary reminder: the mere end of QT does not guarantee a return to the runaway liquidity regime seen in the early COVID era.

Derivatives Dominance and Sentiment Signals

Options Now Move the Market

The derivatives ecosystem—especially options—has exploded in scale. In 2025, Bitcoin’s open interest in options has approached $80 billion, putting it on par with the futures market in terms of capital at risk. As institutions embrace structured exposure, options flows are no longer a fringe indicator—they may actively shape spot BTC direction.

With this maturation, the skew, implied volatility, and term structure of options contracts have become key signals for institutional players watching crypto.

Skew and Hedging Pressures

Even with growing scale, the options market has remained firmly biased toward absorbing downside. The premium tilt toward puts suggests that many holders are hedging or speculating on downside risk, rather than betting on outright upside.

At the same time, futures markets are showing a modest premium environment: the 60-day futures annualized premium lingers around 7%, below levels typically associated with strong bullish momentum.

Macro Headwinds & Market Structure Risks

Deleveraging and Crash Events

While policy signals matter, recent market dynamics have been dominated by deleveraging cascades. Glassnode data suggests a historic $19 billion futures deleveraging event reversed Bitcoin’s rally from $126,100 back toward the $110–115k zone.

That shock pushed BTC price into a reset, where volatility surged, long positions were flushed, and funding rates collapsed—creating a more cautious environment.

These deleveraging events can swamp other signals, especially in a thin or overextended environment.

Weak Institutional Flows & ETF Hesitation

Part of the problem is that while derivatives volumes are large, institutional capital flows into spot (e.g. via ETFs) have lost momentum. ETF inflows that once powered BTC rallies have cooled, possibly shifting the balance from accumulation to caution.

In some weeks, ETFs have shown slight outflows—raising concerns about waning demand underpinning.

Broader Risks: Policy, Geopolitics, and Macro

Ambiguity around U.S. interest rates, inflation, and trade tensions (especially U.S.–China tariff talk) continues to cast a shadow over risk assets. Even if liquidity conditions ease, higher yields or policy volatility could counterbalance any monetary loosening.

Thus, crypto markets face a delicate balance: they must navigate liquidity expectations, macro headwinds, and derivative structure simultaneously.

What This Means for Crypto Seekers & Blockchain Practitioners

1. The Regime Shift Is Subtle, Not Explosive

A halt to QT is not a switch to full-on QE. Investors should temper expectations of a sudden liquidity wave. Instead, watch for confirming signals: sustained rate cuts, clear ETF demand, and consistent derivative skew shifts.

2. Options & Derivative Metrics Are Now Core Signals

In crypto, understanding term structure, implied volatility, skew, open interest, and flows is now nearly as critical as spot-level analysis. These tools reveal how major holders position themselves ahead of macro moves.

3. Hedging Is More Important Than Leverage

Given the current bias toward downside protection in the options markets, building hedged exposure (e.g. via protective puts or collars) may outperform outright leveraged directional bets in volatile regimes.

4. Watch for Gas-Limit Opportunities

Blockchain projects that solve real liquidity, capital efficiency, or risk management problems (e.g. on-chain hedging, volatility tokens, automated structured products) may find room to thrive when large parts of the market are sidelined.

5. Prepare for Range Breakouts or Breakdowns

Crypto tends to spend time in consolidation zones between major structural phases. For BTC, the $110,000–$126,000 band is emerging as a critical battleground. A decisive breakout or breakdown from that range could catalyze a stronger trend.

Conclusion

Powell’s remarks about approaching the end of quantitative tightening should have been a moment of potential upside surprise for crypto markets. Instead, Bitcoin’s muted reaction underscores just how far derivatives, macro complexity, and sentiment have evolved in crypto.

This is not to say opportunity doesn’t exist—far from it. But current conditions reward nuanced strategy over blind optimism. Those who succeed will be those who read the fine print in options, hedge intelligently, and pick blockchain use cases that benefit from periods of structural pause rather than momentum mania.

In short: we may be at a quiet inflection point. But quiet doesn’t mean empty—and savvy participants might find the edges where others see only uncertainty.

Search

About Us and Media

Blockchain and cryptocurrency media covering and exposing the practical application development on the blockchain industry and undiscovered coins.

Featured

Recent Posts

Weekly Tutorial

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit